îòïðàâèòü ñîîáùåíèå êàðòà ñàéòà

ÑÅÍÒßÁÐÜ 2021 ãîäà

ÑÅÍÒßÁÐÜ 2021 ãîäà
ÑÅÍÒßÁÐÜ, 2021

 

ÎÒ ÐÅÄÀÊÖÈÈ // FROM EDITORS
ÌÅÒËÅÍÊÎÂ Í. Ô. ÓÐÁÀÍ-ÊÓËÜÒÓÐÀ
NIKOLAY F. METLENKOV, URBAN CULTURE

 

ÃÐÀÄÎÑÒÐÎÈÒÅËÜÍÀß ÏÎËÈÒÈÊÀ // URBAN PLANNING POLICY — THE DISCUSSION
ÊÐÀØÅÍÈÍÍÈÊÎÂ À.Â. ÃÐÀÄÎÑÒÐÎÈÒÅËÜÍÀß ÏÎËÈÒÈÊÀ
ALEXEY V. KRASHENINNIKOV, URBAN PLANNING POLICY


ÀÕÌÅÄÎÂÀ Å. À., ÂÀÂÈËÎÍÑÊÀß Ò. Â. ÊÎÌÏËÅÊÑÍÎÅ ÐÀÇÂÈÒÈÅ ÒÅÐÐÈÒÎÐÈÉ ÐÅÃÈÎÍÀËÜÍÛÕ ÖÅÍÒÐÎÂ: ÎÑÎÁÅÍÍÎÑÒÈ ÃÐÀÄÎÑÒÐÎÈÒÅËÜÍÎÃÎ ÐÅÃÓËÈÐÎÂÀÍÈß
ELENA A. AHMEDOVA, TATIANA V. VAVILONSKAYA, INTEGRATED DEVELOPMENT OF TERRITORIES OF REGIONAL CENTERS: THE PECULIAR FEATURES OF URBAN REGULATION


ÆÅÁËÈÅÍÎÊ Í.Í. ÎÄÈÍ ÏÈØÅÌ, ÒÐȠ ÓÌÅ: ÏÐÎÁËÅÌÛ ÄÅÔÈÍÈÐÎÂÀÍÈß «ÃÐÀÄÎÑÒÐÎÈÒÅËÜÍÎÃÎ ÌÛØËÅÍÈß»
NATALIA N. ZHEBLIENOK, WE WRITE ONE, THREE IN THE MIND: PROBLEMS OF DEFINING «URBAN PLANNING THINKING»


ÊÐÀØÅÍÈÍÍÈÊÎÂ À.Â. ÏÅÐÑÏÅÊÒÈÂÛ ËÎÊÀËÜÍÎÃÎ ÃÐÀÄÎÑÒÐÎÈÒÅËÜÑÒÂÀ
ALEXEY V. KRASHENINNIKOV, LOCAL PERSPECTIVES OF URBAN PLANNING


ÊÓÊÈÍÀ È. Â. ÌÎÐÔÎËÎÃÈß ÃÎÐÎÄÀ È ÐÅÃËÀÌÅÍÒ ÇÀÑÒÐÎÉÊÈ
IRINA V. KUKINA, URBAN MORPHOLOGY STUDIES AND REGULATION OF THE CITY DEVELOPMENT


ÌÀÒÀØÎÂÀ Ì. ÌÀÑÒÅÐÏËÀÍ ÓÑÒÎÉ×ÈÂÎÃÎ ÃÎÐÎÄÑÊÎÃÎ ÑÎÎÁÙÅÑÒÂÀ:
ÈÍÒÅÃÐÀÒÈÂÍÛÉ ÏÐÎÖÅÑÑ ÏÐÎÅÊÒÈÐÎÂÀÍÈß
MARINA MATASHOVA, SUSTAINABLE COMMUNITY MASTERPLAN: INTEGRATIVE DESIGN PROCESS


ßÍÊÎÂÑÊÀß Þ.Ñ., ÌÅÐÅÍÊΠÀ.Â. ÀÐÕÈÒÅÊÒÓÐÍÛÅ ÊÎÍÖÅÏÒÛ ÃÐÀÄÎÑÒÐÎÈÒÅËÜÍÎÉ ÏÎËÈÒÈÊÈ
YULIA S. YANKOVSKAYA, ALEXEY V. MERENKOV, ARCHITECTURAL CONCEPTS OF URBAN PLANNING POLICY


ÌÎÈÑÅÅ Þ.Ì. ÏÐÎÑÒÐÀÍÑÒÂÅÍÍÛÅ ÌÅÒÀÌÎÐÔÎÇÛ Â ÔÎÐÌÀÒÀÕ ÃÐÀÄÎÑÒÐÎÈÒÅËÜÍÎÉ ÏÎËÈÒÈÊÈ

IOURI M. MOISSEEV, TERRITORIAL METAMORPHOSIS WITHIN THE FORMATS OF URBAN DEVELOPMENT POLICY


ÏÅÐÜÊÎÂÀ Ì. Â., ÁÈÊ Î. Â., ÏÅÐÜÊÎÂÀ À. Þ. ÂËÈßÍÈÅ ÃÐÀÄÎÑÒÐÎÈÒÅËÜÍÎÉ ÏÎËÈÒÈÊÈ ÍÀ ÐÀÇÂÈÒÈÅ ÒÐÀÍÑÏÎÐÒÍÎÉ ÈÍÔÐÀÑÒÐÓÊÒÓÐÛ ÁÅËÃÎÐÎÄÑÊÎÉ ÑÓÁÓÐÁÈÈ
MARGARITA V. PERKOVA, OLEG V. BIK, ALEKSANDRA YU. PERKOVA, INFLUENCE OF URBAN POLICY ON THE DEVELOPMENT OF TRANSPORT INFRASTRUCTURE OF BELGOROD SUBURBIA


ØÓÁÅÍÊΠÌ. Â. ÎÊÑÞÌÎÐÎÍ ÎÒÅ×ÅÑÒÂÅÍÍÎÉ ÃÐÀÄÎÑÒÐÎÈÒÅËÜÍÎÉ ÏÎËÈÒÈÊÈ
MIKHAIL V. SHUBENKOV, THE OXYMORON OF THE NATIONAL URBAN PLANNING POLICY

 

 

ÊÎÍÖÅÏÖÈÈ // CONCEPTS
ÈËÜÂÈÖÊÀß Ñ. Â., ÀØÓÐ Ð., ËÎÁÊÎÂÀ Ò. Â. ÁÈÎÊËÈÌÀÒÈ×ÅÑÊÀß ÀÐÕÈÒÅÊÒÓÐÀ ÀËÆÈÐÀ È ÝÊÎËÎÃÈ×ÅÑÊÀß ÓÑÒÎÉ×ÈÂÎÑÒÜ ÊÓËÜÒÓÐÍÎÃÎ ÍÀÑËÅÄÈß
SVETLANA V. ILVITSKAYA, RYMA ASHUR, TATIANA V. LOBKOVA, BIOCLIMATIC ARCHITECTURE OF ALGERIA AND ECOLOGICAL SUSTAINABILITY OF CULTURAL HERITAGE


ÊÀÌÁÅÊ Ý., ÇÀÁÅËÈÍÀ Å. Â. ÓÏÐÀÂËÅÍÈÅ ÏÐÎÅÊÒÎÌ Â ÐÅÑÒÀÂÐÀÖÈÈ ÍÀ ÏÐÈÌÅÐÅ ÐÀÁÎÒ ÏΠÂÎÑÑÒÀÍÎÂËÅÍÈÞ ÖÈÑÒÅÐÍÛ ÔÅÎÄÎÑÈß
ERKAN KAMBEK, ELENA V. ZABELINA, PROJECT MANAGEMENT IN CONSERVATION: THEODOSIUS CISTERN CASE


ËÅÄÅÍÅÂÀ Ã. Ë., ÏÎÏÎÂÀ Ä. Ë. ÄÎÌ Ê. ÌÅËÜÍÈÊÎÂÀ. Ê ÈÑÒÎÐÈÈ ÏÐÎÈÑÕÎÆÄÅÍÈß ÍÎÂÀÒÎÐÑÊÎÉ ÈÄÅÈ
GALINA L. LEDENEVA, DARIA L. POPOVA, HOUSE OF K. MELNIKOV. TO THE HISTORY OF THE ORIGIN OF THE INNOVATIVE


ÏËÅØÈÂÖÅ À. À. ÒÅÕÍÎÒÎÏÈß Â ÀÐÕÈÒÅÊÒÓÐÅ
ALEXANDER A. PLESHIVTSEV, TECHNOTOPIA IN ARCHITECTURE


ÒÊÀ×Å Â.Í. ÀÐÕÈÒÅÊÒÓÐÀ ÂÎÈÍÑÊÈÕ ÌÅÌÎÐÈÀËÎÂ
VALENTIN N. TKACHEV, ARCHITECTURE OF MILITARY MEMORIALS


ÞÄÈÍÀ Í. Â. ÂÀËÎÐÈÇÀÖÈß ÊÀÊ ÌÅÒÎÄ ÑÎÇÄÀÍÈß ÃÐÀÄÎÑÒÐÎÈÒÅËÜÍÛÕ ÑÈÑÒÅÌ ÍÀ ÎÑÍÎÂÅ ÏÎÒÅÍÖÈÀËÀ ÈÑÒÎÐÈÊÎ-ÊÓËÜÒÓÐÍÛÕ ËÀÍÄØÀÔÒÎÂ
NATALIA V. IUDINA, VALORISATION AS AN APPROACH FOR GENERATION OF URBAN PLANNING SYSTEMS ON THE BASIS OF CULTURAL LANDSCAPES' CAPACITY

 

 

ÏÐÎÔÅÑÑÈÎÍÀËÜÍÀß ÐÅÏËÈÊÀ // PROFESSIONAL REPLICA
×ÅÐÊÀÑΠÃ. Í. ÑÀÌÎÐÀÇÂÈÒÈß ÍÅ ÁÛËÎ
GEORGIY N. CHERKASOV, THERE WAS NO SELF-DEVELOPMENT

 

 

ÒÅÇÀÓÐÓÑ ÀÐÕÈÒÅÊÒÓÐÍÎÃÎ ÌÅÍÒÀËÈÒÅÒÀ XXI ÂÅÊÀ // THESAURUS
ÊÎÂÎÐÊÈÍÃ-ÏÐÎÑÒÐÀÍÑÒÂÀ . Â. ÈËÜÂÈÖÊÀß, À. Ï. ÇÀÉÖÅÂÀ)

 

 

ÀÂÒÎÐÛ ÍÎÌÅÐÀ

ßíäåêñ öèòèðîâàíèÿ Rambler's Top100