îòïðàâèòü ñîîáùåíèå êàðòà ñàéòà
ÅÆÅÊÂÀÐÒÀËÜÍÛÉ 
íàó÷íî-ïðàêòè÷åñêèé è êóëüòóðíî-ïðîñâåòèòåëüñêèé
æóðíàë «Àðõèòåêòóðà è ñòðîèòåëüñòâî Ðîññèè»

âõîäèò â ïåðå÷åíü ðåöåíçèðóåìûõ íàó÷íûõ èçäàíèé Âûñøåé àòòåñòàöèîííîé êîìèññèè (ÂÀÊ) , â êîòîðûõ äîëæíû áûòü îïóáëèêîâàíû îñíîâíûå íàó÷íûå ðåçóëüòàòû äèññåðòàöèé íà ñîèñêàíèå ó÷åíîé ñòåïåíè êàíäèäàòà íàóê, íà ñîèñêàíèå ó÷åíîé ñòåïåíè äîêòîðà íàóê 

âõîäèò â «Áåëûé ñïèñîê»

Æóðíàë âêëþ÷åí â áàçó äàííûõ Ðîññèéñêîãî èíäåêñà íàó÷íîãî öèòèðîâàíèÿ (ÐÈÍÖ) (www.e-library.ru)

 

ÈÞÍÜ, 2026

 

ÌÅÒËÅÍÊÎÂ Í.Ô., ÊÎÍÅÂÀ Å.Â. ÃÓÌÀÍÈÒÀÐÈÇÀÖÈß — ÄÐÀÉÂÅÐ ÐÀÇÂÈÒÈß ÀÐÕÈÒÅÊÒÓÐÍÎÃÎ ÎÁÐÀÇÎÂÀÍÈß XXI ÂÅÊÀ
NIKOLAY F. METLENKOV, EKATERINA V. KONEVA, HUMANITARIZATION IS A DRIVER OF THE DEVELOPMENT OF ARCHITECTURAL EDUCATION IN THE 21ST CENTURY


ÊÎÍÖÅÏÖÈÈ // CONCEPTS
ÀÊÈØÅÂÀ Â.Ä., ÁËÀÃÎÂÈÄÎÂÀ Í.Ã. ÏÐÈÍÖÈÏÛ ÏÎÑÒÐÎÅÍÈß ÌÎÄÅËÈ ÈÄÅÍÒÈ×ÍÎÑÒÈ Â ÑÈÑÒÅÌÅ ÌÀÊÐÎÐÅÃÈÎÍÀËÜÍÛÕ ÈÍÒÅÃÐÀÖÈÉ ÍÀ ÏÐÈÌÅÐÅ ÀÐÕÀÍÃÅËÜÑÊÎÉ ÎÁËÀÑÒÈ
VERA D. AKISHEVA, NATALIA G. BLAGOVIDOVA, PRINCIPLES OF IDENTITY MODEL CONSTRUCTION IN THE SYSTEM OF MACRO-REGIONAL INTEGRATIONS: THE CASE OF ARKHANGELSK REGION

 

ÁÀÁÎÂÈ× Â., ÒÊÀ×Å Â.Í. ÊÐÈÇÈÑ ÀÐÕÈÒÅÊÒÓÐÍÎÉ ÏÀÐÀÄÈÃÌÛ XXI ÂÅÊÀ È ÅÃΠÏÎÑËÅÄÑÒÂÈß
VASO BABOVICH, VALENTIN N. TKACHEV, CRISIS OF THE 21ST CENTURY ARCHITECTURAL PARADIGM AND ITS CONSEQUENCES

 

ÁÅÍÍÀÌÀÐ Ô., ÈËÜÂÈÖÊÀß Ñ.Â. ÀÊÒÓÀËÜÍÎÑÒÜ ÝËÅÌÅÍÒÎÂ ÄÐÅÂÍÅÉ ÀÐÕÈÒÅÊÒÓÐÛ (íà ïðèìåðå ñòðàí ñ æàðêèì è çàñóøëèâûì êëèìàòîì)
FATIMA BENNAMAR, SVETLANA V. ILVITSKAYA, RELEVANCE OF ANCIENT ARCHITECTURE ELEMENTS (in countries with hot and aried climate)

 

ÁÀÍÍÎÂÀ Ï.Ä., ÊÈßÍÅÍÊÎ Ê.Â. ÀÐÕÈÒÅÊÒÓÐÍÎÅ ÎÁÐÀÇÎÂÀÍÈÅ ÍÀ ÝÒÀÏÀÕ ÐÀÇÂÈÒÈß ÖÈÂÈËÈÇÀÖÈÈ
POLINA D. BANNOVA, KONSTANTIN V. KIYANENKO, ARCHITECTURAL EDUCATION AT THE STAGES OF CIVILIZATION

 

ÈËÜÂÈÖÊÀß Ñ.Â., ÄÀÍ×ÅÍÊÎ À.Þ., ÑÈÇÎÂÀ À.Ä. ÏÐÎÌÛØËÅÍÍÀß ÀÐÕÈÒÅÊÒÓÐÀ  ÓÑËÎÂÈßÕ ÊÐÀÉÍÅÃÎ ÑÅÂÅÐÀ: ÃÅÍÅÇÈÑ, ÒÐÀÍÑÔÎÐÌÀÖÈß È ÏÅÐÑÏÅÊÒÈÂÛ ÐÀÇÂÈÒÈß
SVETLANA V. ILVITSKAYA, ALICE YU. DANCHENKO, ANASTASIA D. SIZOVA, INDUSTRIAL ARCHITECTURE IN THE CONDITIONS OF THE FAR NORTH: GENESIS, TRANSFORMATION AND DEVELOPMENT PROSPECTS

 

ÁÎËÒÅÍÊÎ Ï.Ñ. ÊÎÌÌÓÍÈÊÀÒÈÂÍÛÉ ÏÎÒÅÍÖÈÀË ÓÐÁÎÑÐÅÄÛ Â ÊÎÍÒÅÊÑÒÅ ÑÎÂÐÅÌÅÍÍÎÉ ÒÅÕÍÈ×ÅÑÊÎÉ ÝÑÒÅÒÈÊÈ
POLINA S. BOLTENKO, THE COMMUNICATIVE POTENTIAL OF THE URBAN ENVIRONMENT IN THE CONTEXT OF MODERN TECHNICAL AESTHETICS

 

ÂÀÐÃÀÑ À.Ð.À., ÂÎËÈ×ÅÍÊÎ Î.Â. ÀÄÀÏÒÈÂÍÀß ÏËÀÂÓ×Àß ÀÐÕÈÒÅÊÒÓÐÀ ÄËß ÐÛÁÀÖÊÈÕ ÏÎÑÅËÅÍÈÉ ÑÜÅÍÀÃÀ-ÃÐÀÍÄÅ-ÄÅ-ÑÀÍÒÀ-ÌÀÐÒÀ
ACEROS RAFAEL ANTONIO VARGAS, OLGA V. VOLICHENKO, ADAPTIVE FLOATING ARCHITECTURE FOR THE FISHING VILLAGES OF CIENAGA GRANDE DE SANTA MARTA

 

ÃÀÐÀÅ À.À., ÒÓÊÌÀÊÎÂÀ Ì.È. ÈÑÊÓÑÑÒÂÅÍÍÛÉ ÈÍÒÅËËÅÊÒ Â ÀÐÕÈÒÅÊÒÓÐÍÎÌ ÏÐÎÅÊÒÈÐÎÂÀÍÈÈ È ÔÀÑÀÄÍÎÉ ÂÈÇÓÀËÈÇÀÖÈÈ
AYNUR A. GARAEV, MILYAUSHA I. TUKMAKOVA, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE IN ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN AND FACADE VISUALIZATION

 

ÊÀÃÀÍÎÂÈ×-ÌÈÍÅÐÂÈÍÀ Ì.Ã., ÎÑÅËÊÎ Ý.Ã., ÑÈÇÎÂÀ À.Ä., ÄÀÍ×ÅÍÊÎ À.Þ., ÈËÜÂÈÖÊÀß Ñ.Â. ËÀÍÄØÀÔÒÍÛÉ ÄÈÇÀÉÍ Â ÐÅÍÎÂÀÖÈÈ ÒÅÐÐÈÒÎÐÈÉ
MARIA G. KAGANOVICH-MINERVINA, EDUARD G. OSELKO, ALISA YU. DANCHENKO, ANASTASIA D. SIZOVA, SVETLANA V. ILVITSKAYA, LANDSCAPE DESIGN IN TERRITORIAL RENOVATION

 

ÊÎÂÀËÅ Â. À. ÂÎËÈ×ÅÍÊÎ Î. Â. ÐÀÇÐÀÁÎÒÊÀ ÏÀÐÀÌÅÒÐÈ×ÅÑÊÎÃÎ ÊÎÍÑÒÐÓÊÒÎÐÀ ÎÁÚ¨ÌÍÎ-ÏËÀÍÈÐÎÂÎ×ÍÛÕ ÐÅØÅÍÈÉ ÄËß ÁÛÑÒÐÎÂÎÇÂÎÄÈÌÛÕ ÌÎÄÓËÜÍÛÕ ÇÄÀÍÈÉ ÀÌÁÓËÀÒÎÐÍÎÃÎ ÇÂÅÍÀ
VLADISLAV A. KOVALEV, OLGA V. VOLICHENKO, DEVELOPMENT OF A PARAMETRIC CONSTRUCTOR OF SPACE-PLANNING SOLUTIONS FOR RAPIDLY ERECTED MODULAR OUTPATIENT BUILDINGS

 

ÊÎÐÎÒÅÅÂÀ Ò.Þ., ÈËÜÂÈÖÊÀß Ñ.Â. ÔÓÍÊÖÈÈ ÈÃÐÎÂÛÕ ÏÐÎÑÒÐÀÍÑÒ  ÀÐÕÈÒÅÊÒÓÐÅ ÑÎÂÐÅÌÅÍÍÎÉ ØÊÎËÛ ÐÅÑÏÓÁËÈÊÈ ÁÅËÀÐÓÑÜ
TATSIANA YU. KARATSEYEVA, SVETLANA V. ILVITSKAYA, FUNCTIONS OF PLAY SPACES IN THE ARCHITECTURE OF THE MODERN SCHOOL OF THE REPUBLIC OF BELARUS

 

ÈÑÊÐÈÍ Í.Ñ., ÊÎÍÅÂÀ Å.Â. ÑÎÂÐÅÌÅÍÍÎÅ ÏÅÐÅÎÑÌÛÑËÅÍÈÅ ÀÐÕÈÒÅÊÒÓÐÍÎ-ËÀÍÄØÀÔÒÍÎÉ ÎÐÃÀÍÈÇÀÖÈÈ ÓÑÀÄÅÁ ÍÀ ÎÑÍÎÂÅ ÏÐÈÍÖÈÏÎÂ ËÀÍÄØÀÔÒÍÎÃÎ ÏÐÎÅÊÒÈÐÎÂÀÍÈß À.Ò. ÁÎËÎÒÎÂÀ
NIKITA S. ISKRIN, EKATERINA V. KONEVA, MODERN RETHINKING OF THE ARCHITECTURAL AND LANDSCAPE ORGANIZATION OF ESTATES BASED ON THE PRINCIPLES OF LANDSCAPE DESIGN BY A.T. BOLOTOV

 

ÌÀËÜÖÅÂÀ À.À. ÑÎÂÐÅÌÍÍÛÅ ÒÈÏÎËÎÃÈ×ÅÑÊÈÅ ÎÑÎÁÅÍÍÎÑÒÈ ÁÎÒÀÍÈ×ÅÑÊÈÕ ÑÀÄÎÂ
ALENA A. MALTSEVA, MODERN TYPOLOGICAL FEATURES OF BOTANICAL GARDENS

 

ÌÀÐÅÍÊΠÊ.À., ÐÀÄÈÎÍΠÒ.Â., ÀÕÒßÌÎÂÀ Ë.Ø. ÑËÎÆÈÂØÈÅÑß ÏÎÄÕÎÄÛ ÀÐÕÈÒÅÊÒÓÐÍÎ-ÑÐÅÄÎÂÎÉ ÎÐÃÀÍÈÇÀÖÈÈ ÇÄÀÍÈÉ ÍÀÓ×ÍÎ-ÎÁÐÀÇÎÂÀÒÅËÜÍÛÕ ÖÅÍÒÐÎÂ
KONSTANTIN A. MARENKOV, TIMUR V. RADIONOV, LEYSAN SH. AKHTYAMOVA, ESTABLISHED APPROACHES TO THE ARCHITECTURAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL ORGANIZATION OF SCIENTIFIC AND EDUCATIONAL CENTERS

 

ÌÈÕÀÉËÎÂ È.Â., ÃÎÐÎÄÎÂÀ Ì.Í. ÒÅÍÄÅÍÖÈÈ ÔÎÐÌÈÐÎÂÀÍÈß ÎÁËÈÊÀ
ÑÎÂÐÅÌÅÍÍÎÃÎ ÌÓÇÅß Â ÊÎÍÒÅÊÑÒÅ ÃÎÐÎÄÀ
IVAN V. MIKHAILOV, MARGARITA N. GORODOVA, TRENDS IN THE FORMATION OF THE IMAGE OF A MODERN MUSEUM IN THE CONTEXT OF THE CITY

 

ÑÀËßÕÓÒÄÈÍΠÐ.Í. ÐÎÌÀÍÎÂÀ À.È., ÑÀÒÒÀÐΠÀ.Ã., ÊÓÄÐߨÅÂÀ Å.À. ÃÀÉÍÓÒÄÈÍÎÂÀ Ý.Ý. ÒÀÒÀÐÑÊÈÅ ÎÐÍÀÌÅÍÒÛ Â ÄÈÇÀÉÍÅ: ÃÅÍÅÇÈÑ, ÑÅÌÀÍÒÈÊÀ È ÑÎÂÐÅÌÅÍÍÛÅ ÏÐÀÊÒÈÊÈ ÈÍÒÅÃÐÀÖÈÈ Â ÀÐÕÈÒÅÊÒÓÐÍÓÞ ÑÐÅÄÓ
RISHAT N. SALYAKHUTDINOV, ANNA I. ROMANOVA, AIVAR G. SATTAROV, ELENA A. KUDRYASHEVA, ESRA. Å. GAINUTDINOVA, TATAR ORNAMENTS IN DESIGN: GENESIS, SEMANTICS AND MODERN PRACTICES OF INTEGRATION INTO THE ARCHITECTURAL ENVIRONMENT

 

ÔÈËÀÒÎÂÀ Å.À. ÐÅÂÈÒÀËÈÇÀÖÈß ÍÎÂÛÕ ÎÑÓØÅÍÍÛÕ ÒÅÐÐÈÒÎÐÈÉ ÂÅÐÕÍÅÉ ÂÎËÃÈ
EKATERINA A. FILATOVA, REVITALIZATION OF THE NEWLY DRAINED AREAS OF THE UPPER VOLGA REGION


ÏÐÎÔÅÑÑÈÎÍÀËÜÍÀß ÐÅÏËÈÊÀ // PROFESSIONAL REPLICA
ÁÅÌÁÅËÜ È.Î. ÃËÀÑ ÂÎÏÈÞÙÅÃΠÈËÈ ÏÎ×ÅÌÓ Â ÀÐÕÈÒÅÊÒÓÐÍÎÉ ÍÀÓÊÅ ÎÒÑÓÒÑÒÂÓÅÒ ÏÎËÅÌÈÊÀ?
IRINA O. BEMBEL', A VOICE CRYING OR WHY IS THERE A LACK OF POLEMICS IN ARCHITECTURAL SCIENCE?

 

ÁÀÆÅÍÎÂÀ Å.Ñ., ÁÀÆÅÍΠÀ.Â. ÀÐÕÈÒÅÊÒÓÐÀ  ÊÎÍÒÅÊÑÒÅ ÊÐÅÀÒÈÂÍÎÉ ÈÍÄÓÑÒÐÈÈ
ELENA S. BAZHENOVA, ALEXANDER V. BAZHENOV, ARCHITECTURE IN THE CONTEXT OF THE CREATIVE INDUSTRY

 

ÈÃÍÀÒÎÂÀ À.Ï. ÀÊÒÓÀËÜÍÛÅ ÂÎÏÐÎÑÛ ÀÐÕÈÒÅÊÒÓÐÍÎÉ ÏÐÎÏÅÄÅÂÒÈÊÈ. ÏÐÈÃËÀØÅÍÈÅ Ê ÏÎËÈËÎÃÓ
ALEXANDRA P. IGNATOVA, CURRENT ISSUES OF ARCHITECTURAL PROPAEDEUTICS: AN INVITATION TO A POLYLOGUE

 

ËÀÇÀÐÅÂÀ Ì.Â. ÎÐÃÀÍÈÇÀÖÈß ÏÐÎÑÒÐÀÍÑÒÂÀ ÄËß ÌÎËÎÄÅÆÈ (íà ïðèìåðå òåððèòîðèé ïîä ýñòàêàäàìè)
MARIA V. LAZAREVA, ORGANIZING A SPACE FOR YOUNG PEOPLE (using the example of territories under overpasses)

 

ËÈÑÅÍÊÎÂÀ Þ.Â. ÈÑÊÓÑÑÒÂÅÍÍÛÉ ÈÍÒÅËËÅÊÒ ÊÀÊ ÈÍÑÒÐÓÌÅÍÒ ÀÍÀËÈÒÈ×ÅÑÊÎÃÎ ÈÑÑËÅÄÎÂÀÍÈß ÍÀ ÏÅÐÂÛÕ ÝÒÀÏÀÕ ÀÐÕÈÒÅÊÒÓÐÍÎÃÎ ÎÁÐÀÇÎÂÀÍÈß
YULIA V. LISENKOVA, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE AS A TOOL FOR ANALYTICAL RESEARCH IN THE EARLY STAGES OF ARCHITECTURAL EDUCATION

 

×ÅÐÊÀÑΠÃ.Í. ÏÀÌßÒÍÈÊÈ ÂÎÉÍÛ — 1941-1945 — ÍÀ ÏÐÎÌÛØËÅÍÍÛÕ ÏÐÅÄÏÐÈßÒÈßÕ È ÍÀ ÏÎËßÕ ÂÎÉÍÛ, ÈÄÅÎËÎÃÈß, ÏÐÀÂÄÈÂÎÑÒÜ, ÎÁÐÀÇÍÎÑÒÜ, ÏÎÑËÅÄÓÞÙÈÅ ÑÎÖÈÎ-ÀÐÕÈÒÅÊÒÓÐÍÛÅ ÊÎÍÖÅÏÖÈÈ
GEORGIY N. CHERKASOV, WAR MONUMENTS — 1941-1945 — AT INDUSTRIAL ENTERPRISES AND ON THE WARFIELDS, IDEOLOGY, TRUTH, IMAGERY, SUBSEQUENT SOCIAL-ARCHITECTURAL CONCEPTS

 

ØÓËÈÊÀ Ò.Î. ÎÒ ÀËÃÎÐÈÒÌÀ Ê ÑÈÑÒÅÌÅ: ÊÀÊ ÈÍÒÅÐÂÜÞ Ñ ÏÐÀÊÒÈÊÀÌÈ ÂÛßÂÈËÎ ÏÐÎÁËÅÌÍÛÅ ÓÇËÛ ÀÐÕÈÒÅÊÒÓÐÍÎÃÎ ÎÁÐÀÇÎÂÀÍÈß
TATIANA O. SHULIKA, FROM ALGORITHM TO SYSTEM: HOW INTERVIEWS WITH PRACTITIONERS REVEALED THE PROBLEMATIC NODES OF ARCHITECTURAL EDUCATION


ÒÅÇÓÀÐÓÑ // THESAURUS

ÈÍÔÎÐÌÀÖÈÎÍÍÎÅ ÌÎÄÅËÈÐÎÂÀÍÈÅ ÇÄÀÍÈÉ (BIM) (Àááàñçàäåõ Í., Êàëóãèí À. Í., ×èñòÿêîâ Ä. À., Òóðêèíà Å. À.)
ÑÎÂÐÅÌÅÍÍÛÅ ÀÝÐÎÂÎÊÇÀËÛ (Àâåðêèåâ Â. À.)

ÀÃÐÎÏÐÎÌÛØËÅÍÍÀß ÀÐÕÈÒÅÊÒÓÐÀ (Êîìàðîâà Ä. À., Êîíåâà Å. Â.)

 

ÀÂÒÎÐÛ ÍÎÌÅÐÀ

ßíäåêñ öèòèðîâàíèÿ Rambler's Top100