|
ÅÆÅÊÂÀÐÒÀËÜÍÛÉ
íàó÷íî-ïðàêòè÷åñêèé è êóëüòóðíî-ïðîñâåòèòåëüñêèé
æóðíàë «Àðõèòåêòóðà è ñòðîèòåëüñòâî Ðîññèè»
âõîäèò â ïåðå÷åíü ðåöåíçèðóåìûõ íàó÷íûõ èçäàíèé Âûñøåé àòòåñòàöèîííîé êîìèññèè (ÂÀÊ) , â êîòîðûõ äîëæíû áûòü îïóáëèêîâàíû îñíîâíûå íàó÷íûå ðåçóëüòàòû äèññåðòàöèé íà ñîèñêàíèå ó÷åíîé ñòåïåíè êàíäèäàòà íàóê, íà ñîèñêàíèå ó÷åíîé ñòåïåíè äîêòîðà íàóê
âõîäèò â «Áåëûé ñïèñîê»
Æóðíàë âêëþ÷åí â áàçó äàííûõ Ðîññèéñêîãî èíäåêñà íàó÷íîãî öèòèðîâàíèÿ (ÐÈÍÖ) (www.e-library.ru)


ÈÞÍÜ, 2026
ÌÅÒËÅÍÊÎÂ Í.Ô., ÊÎÍÅÂÀ Å.Â. ÃÓÌÀÍÈÒÀÐÈÇÀÖÈß — ÄÐÀÉÂÅÐ ÐÀÇÂÈÒÈß ÀÐÕÈÒÅÊÒÓÐÍÎÃÎ ÎÁÐÀÇÎÂÀÍÈß XXI ÂÅÊÀ NIKOLAY F. METLENKOV, EKATERINA V. KONEVA, HUMANITARIZATION IS A DRIVER OF THE DEVELOPMENT OF ARCHITECTURAL EDUCATION IN THE 21ST CENTURY
ÊÎÍÖÅÏÖÈÈ // CONCEPTS ÀÊÈØÅÂÀ Â.Ä., ÁËÀÃÎÂÈÄÎÂÀ Í.Ã. ÏÐÈÍÖÈÏÛ ÏÎÑÒÐÎÅÍÈß ÌÎÄÅËÈ ÈÄÅÍÒÈ×ÍÎÑÒÈ Â ÑÈÑÒÅÌÅ ÌÀÊÐÎÐÅÃÈÎÍÀËÜÍÛÕ ÈÍÒÅÃÐÀÖÈÉ ÍÀ ÏÐÈÌÅÐÅ ÀÐÕÀÍÃÅËÜÑÊÎÉ ÎÁËÀÑÒÈ VERA D. AKISHEVA, NATALIA G. BLAGOVIDOVA, PRINCIPLES OF IDENTITY MODEL CONSTRUCTION IN THE SYSTEM OF MACRO-REGIONAL INTEGRATIONS: THE CASE OF ARKHANGELSK REGION
ÁÀÁÎÂÈ× Â., ÒÊÀ×Å Â.Í. ÊÐÈÇÈÑ ÀÐÕÈÒÅÊÒÓÐÍÎÉ ÏÀÐÀÄÈÃÌÛ XXI ÂÅÊÀ È ÅÃÎ ÏÎÑËÅÄÑÒÂÈß VASO BABOVICH, VALENTIN N. TKACHEV, CRISIS OF THE 21ST CENTURY ARCHITECTURAL PARADIGM AND ITS CONSEQUENCES
ÁÅÍÍÀÌÀÐ Ô., ÈËÜÂÈÖÊÀß Ñ.Â. ÀÊÒÓÀËÜÍÎÑÒÜ ÝËÅÌÅÍÒÎÂ ÄÐÅÂÍÅÉ ÀÐÕÈÒÅÊÒÓÐÛ (íà ïðèìåðå ñòðàí ñ æàðêèì è çàñóøëèâûì êëèìàòîì) FATIMA BENNAMAR, SVETLANA V. ILVITSKAYA, RELEVANCE OF ANCIENT ARCHITECTURE ELEMENTS (in countries with hot and aried climate)
ÁÀÍÍÎÂÀ Ï.Ä., ÊÈßÍÅÍÊÎ Ê.Â. ÀÐÕÈÒÅÊÒÓÐÍÎÅ ÎÁÐÀÇÎÂÀÍÈÅ ÍÀ ÝÒÀÏÀÕ ÐÀÇÂÈÒÈß ÖÈÂÈËÈÇÀÖÈÈ POLINA D. BANNOVA, KONSTANTIN V. KIYANENKO, ARCHITECTURAL EDUCATION AT THE STAGES OF CIVILIZATION
ÈËÜÂÈÖÊÀß Ñ.Â., ÄÀÍ×ÅÍÊÎ À.Þ., ÑÈÇÎÂÀ À.Ä. ÏÐÎÌÛØËÅÍÍÀß ÀÐÕÈÒÅÊÒÓÐÀ  ÓÑËÎÂÈßÕ ÊÐÀÉÍÅÃÎ ÑÅÂÅÐÀ: ÃÅÍÅÇÈÑ, ÒÐÀÍÑÔÎÐÌÀÖÈß È ÏÅÐÑÏÅÊÒÈÂÛ ÐÀÇÂÈÒÈß SVETLANA V. ILVITSKAYA, ALICE YU. DANCHENKO, ANASTASIA D. SIZOVA, INDUSTRIAL ARCHITECTURE IN THE CONDITIONS OF THE FAR NORTH: GENESIS, TRANSFORMATION AND DEVELOPMENT PROSPECTS
ÁÎËÒÅÍÊÎ Ï.Ñ. ÊÎÌÌÓÍÈÊÀÒÈÂÍÛÉ ÏÎÒÅÍÖÈÀË ÓÐÁÎÑÐÅÄÛ Â ÊÎÍÒÅÊÑÒÅ ÑÎÂÐÅÌÅÍÍÎÉ ÒÅÕÍÈ×ÅÑÊÎÉ ÝÑÒÅÒÈÊÈ POLINA S. BOLTENKO, THE COMMUNICATIVE POTENTIAL OF THE URBAN ENVIRONMENT IN THE CONTEXT OF MODERN TECHNICAL AESTHETICS
ÂÀÐÃÀÑ À.Ð.À., ÂÎËÈ×ÅÍÊÎ Î.Â. ÀÄÀÏÒÈÂÍÀß ÏËÀÂÓ×Àß ÀÐÕÈÒÅÊÒÓÐÀ ÄËß ÐÛÁÀÖÊÈÕ ÏÎÑÅËÅÍÈÉ ÑÜÅÍÀÃÀ-ÃÐÀÍÄÅ-ÄÅ-ÑÀÍÒÀ-ÌÀÐÒÀ ACEROS RAFAEL ANTONIO VARGAS, OLGA V. VOLICHENKO, ADAPTIVE FLOATING ARCHITECTURE FOR THE FISHING VILLAGES OF CIENAGA GRANDE DE SANTA MARTA
ÃÀÐÀÅÂ À.À., ÒÓÊÌÀÊÎÂÀ Ì.È. ÈÑÊÓÑÑÒÂÅÍÍÛÉ ÈÍÒÅËËÅÊÒ Â ÀÐÕÈÒÅÊÒÓÐÍÎÌ ÏÐÎÅÊÒÈÐÎÂÀÍÈÈ È ÔÀÑÀÄÍÎÉ ÂÈÇÓÀËÈÇÀÖÈÈ AYNUR A. GARAEV, MILYAUSHA I. TUKMAKOVA, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE IN ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN AND FACADE VISUALIZATION
ÊÀÃÀÍÎÂÈ×-ÌÈÍÅÐÂÈÍÀ Ì.Ã., ÎÑÅËÊÎ Ý.Ã., ÑÈÇÎÂÀ À.Ä., ÄÀÍ×ÅÍÊÎ À.Þ., ÈËÜÂÈÖÊÀß Ñ.Â. ËÀÍÄØÀÔÒÍÛÉ ÄÈÇÀÉÍ Â ÐÅÍÎÂÀÖÈÈ ÒÅÐÐÈÒÎÐÈÉ MARIA G. KAGANOVICH-MINERVINA, EDUARD G. OSELKO, ALISA YU. DANCHENKO, ANASTASIA D. SIZOVA, SVETLANA V. ILVITSKAYA, LANDSCAPE DESIGN IN TERRITORIAL RENOVATION
ÊÎÂÀËÅ Â. À. ÂÎËÈ×ÅÍÊÎ Î. Â. ÐÀÇÐÀÁÎÒÊÀ ÏÀÐÀÌÅÒÐÈ×ÅÑÊÎÃÎ ÊÎÍÑÒÐÓÊÒÎÐÀ ÎÁÚ¨ÌÍÎ-ÏËÀÍÈÐÎÂÎ×ÍÛÕ ÐÅØÅÍÈÉ ÄËß ÁÛÑÒÐÎÂÎÇÂÎÄÈÌÛÕ ÌÎÄÓËÜÍÛÕ ÇÄÀÍÈÉ ÀÌÁÓËÀÒÎÐÍÎÃÎ ÇÂÅÍÀ VLADISLAV A. KOVALEV, OLGA V. VOLICHENKO, DEVELOPMENT OF A PARAMETRIC CONSTRUCTOR OF SPACE-PLANNING SOLUTIONS FOR RAPIDLY ERECTED MODULAR OUTPATIENT BUILDINGS
ÊÎÐÎÒÅÅÂÀ Ò.Þ., ÈËÜÂÈÖÊÀß Ñ.Â. ÔÓÍÊÖÈÈ ÈÃÐÎÂÛÕ ÏÐÎÑÒÐÀÍÑÒÂ Â ÀÐÕÈÒÅÊÒÓÐÅ ÑÎÂÐÅÌÅÍÍÎÉ ØÊÎËÛ ÐÅÑÏÓÁËÈÊÈ ÁÅËÀÐÓÑÜ TATSIANA YU. KARATSEYEVA, SVETLANA V. ILVITSKAYA, FUNCTIONS OF PLAY SPACES IN THE ARCHITECTURE OF THE MODERN SCHOOL OF THE REPUBLIC OF BELARUS
ÈÑÊÐÈÍ Í.Ñ., ÊÎÍÅÂÀ Å.Â. ÑÎÂÐÅÌÅÍÍÎÅ ÏÅÐÅÎÑÌÛÑËÅÍÈÅ ÀÐÕÈÒÅÊÒÓÐÍÎ-ËÀÍÄØÀÔÒÍÎÉ ÎÐÃÀÍÈÇÀÖÈÈ ÓÑÀÄÅÁ ÍÀ ÎÑÍÎÂÅ ÏÐÈÍÖÈÏÎÂ ËÀÍÄØÀÔÒÍÎÃÎ ÏÐÎÅÊÒÈÐÎÂÀÍÈß À.Ò. ÁÎËÎÒÎÂÀ NIKITA S. ISKRIN, EKATERINA V. KONEVA, MODERN RETHINKING OF THE ARCHITECTURAL AND LANDSCAPE ORGANIZATION OF ESTATES BASED ON THE PRINCIPLES OF LANDSCAPE DESIGN BY A.T. BOLOTOV
ÌÀËÜÖÅÂÀ À.À. ÑÎÂÐÅÌÍÍÛÅ ÒÈÏÎËÎÃÈ×ÅÑÊÈÅ ÎÑÎÁÅÍÍÎÑÒÈ ÁÎÒÀÍÈ×ÅÑÊÈÕ ÑÀÄΠALENA A. MALTSEVA, MODERN TYPOLOGICAL FEATURES OF BOTANICAL GARDENS
ÌÀÐÅÍÊΠÊ.À., ÐÀÄÈÎÍΠÒ.Â., ÀÕÒßÌÎÂÀ Ë.Ø. ÑËÎÆÈÂØÈÅÑß ÏÎÄÕÎÄÛ ÀÐÕÈÒÅÊÒÓÐÍÎ-ÑÐÅÄÎÂÎÉ ÎÐÃÀÍÈÇÀÖÈÈ ÇÄÀÍÈÉ ÍÀÓ×ÍÎ-ÎÁÐÀÇÎÂÀÒÅËÜÍÛÕ ÖÅÍÒÐΠKONSTANTIN A. MARENKOV, TIMUR V. RADIONOV, LEYSAN SH. AKHTYAMOVA, ESTABLISHED APPROACHES TO THE ARCHITECTURAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL ORGANIZATION OF SCIENTIFIC AND EDUCATIONAL CENTERS
ÌÈÕÀÉËÎÂ È.Â., ÃÎÐÎÄÎÂÀ Ì.Í. ÒÅÍÄÅÍÖÈÈ ÔÎÐÌÈÐÎÂÀÍÈß ÎÁËÈÊÀ ÑÎÂÐÅÌÅÍÍÎÃÎ ÌÓÇÅß Â ÊÎÍÒÅÊÑÒÅ ÃÎÐÎÄÀ IVAN V. MIKHAILOV, MARGARITA N. GORODOVA, TRENDS IN THE FORMATION OF THE IMAGE OF A MODERN MUSEUM IN THE CONTEXT OF THE CITY
ÑÀËßÕÓÒÄÈÍΠÐ.Í. ÐÎÌÀÍÎÂÀ À.È., ÑÀÒÒÀÐΠÀ.Ã., ÊÓÄÐߨÅÂÀ Å.À. ÃÀÉÍÓÒÄÈÍÎÂÀ Ý.Ý. ÒÀÒÀÐÑÊÈÅ ÎÐÍÀÌÅÍÒÛ Â ÄÈÇÀÉÍÅ: ÃÅÍÅÇÈÑ, ÑÅÌÀÍÒÈÊÀ È ÑÎÂÐÅÌÅÍÍÛÅ ÏÐÀÊÒÈÊÈ ÈÍÒÅÃÐÀÖÈÈ Â ÀÐÕÈÒÅÊÒÓÐÍÓÞ ÑÐÅÄÓ RISHAT N. SALYAKHUTDINOV, ANNA I. ROMANOVA, AIVAR G. SATTAROV, ELENA A. KUDRYASHEVA, ESRA. Å. GAINUTDINOVA, TATAR ORNAMENTS IN DESIGN: GENESIS, SEMANTICS AND MODERN PRACTICES OF INTEGRATION INTO THE ARCHITECTURAL ENVIRONMENT
ÔÈËÀÒÎÂÀ Å.À. ÐÅÂÈÒÀËÈÇÀÖÈß ÍÎÂÛÕ ÎÑÓØÅÍÍÛÕ ÒÅÐÐÈÒÎÐÈÉ ÂÅÐÕÍÅÉ ÂÎËÃÈ EKATERINA A. FILATOVA, REVITALIZATION OF THE NEWLY DRAINED AREAS OF THE UPPER VOLGA REGION
ÏÐÎÔÅÑÑÈÎÍÀËÜÍÀß ÐÅÏËÈÊÀ // PROFESSIONAL REPLICA ÁÅÌÁÅËÜ È.Î. ÃËÀÑ ÂÎÏÈÞÙÅÃÎ ÈËÈ ÏÎ×ÅÌÓ Â ÀÐÕÈÒÅÊÒÓÐÍÎÉ ÍÀÓÊÅ ÎÒÑÓÒÑÒÂÓÅÒ ÏÎËÅÌÈÊÀ? IRINA O. BEMBEL', A VOICE CRYING OR WHY IS THERE A LACK OF POLEMICS IN ARCHITECTURAL SCIENCE?
ÁÀÆÅÍÎÂÀ Å.Ñ., ÁÀÆÅÍÎÂ À.Â. ÀÐÕÈÒÅÊÒÓÐÀ Â ÊÎÍÒÅÊÑÒÅ ÊÐÅÀÒÈÂÍÎÉ ÈÍÄÓÑÒÐÈÈ ELENA S. BAZHENOVA, ALEXANDER V. BAZHENOV, ARCHITECTURE IN THE CONTEXT OF THE CREATIVE INDUSTRY
ÈÃÍÀÒÎÂÀ À.Ï. ÀÊÒÓÀËÜÍÛÅ ÂÎÏÐÎÑÛ ÀÐÕÈÒÅÊÒÓÐÍÎÉ ÏÐÎÏÅÄÅÂÒÈÊÈ. ÏÐÈÃËÀØÅÍÈÅ Ê ÏÎËÈËÎÃÓ ALEXANDRA P. IGNATOVA, CURRENT ISSUES OF ARCHITECTURAL PROPAEDEUTICS: AN INVITATION TO A POLYLOGUE
ËÀÇÀÐÅÂÀ Ì.Â. ÎÐÃÀÍÈÇÀÖÈß ÏÐÎÑÒÐÀÍÑÒÂÀ ÄËß ÌÎËÎÄÅÆÈ (íà ïðèìåðå òåððèòîðèé ïîä ýñòàêàäàìè) MARIA V. LAZAREVA, ORGANIZING A SPACE FOR YOUNG PEOPLE (using the example of territories under overpasses)
ËÈÑÅÍÊÎÂÀ Þ.Â. ÈÑÊÓÑÑÒÂÅÍÍÛÉ ÈÍÒÅËËÅÊÒ ÊÀÊ ÈÍÑÒÐÓÌÅÍÒ ÀÍÀËÈÒÈ×ÅÑÊÎÃÎ ÈÑÑËÅÄÎÂÀÍÈß ÍÀ ÏÅÐÂÛÕ ÝÒÀÏÀÕ ÀÐÕÈÒÅÊÒÓÐÍÎÃÎ ÎÁÐÀÇÎÂÀÍÈß YULIA V. LISENKOVA, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE AS A TOOL FOR ANALYTICAL RESEARCH IN THE EARLY STAGES OF ARCHITECTURAL EDUCATION
×ÅÐÊÀÑΠÃ.Í. ÏÀÌßÒÍÈÊÈ ÂÎÉÍÛ — 1941-1945 — ÍÀ ÏÐÎÌÛØËÅÍÍÛÕ ÏÐÅÄÏÐÈßÒÈßÕ È ÍÀ ÏÎËßÕ ÂÎÉÍÛ, ÈÄÅÎËÎÃÈß, ÏÐÀÂÄÈÂÎÑÒÜ, ÎÁÐÀÇÍÎÑÒÜ, ÏÎÑËÅÄÓÞÙÈÅ ÑÎÖÈÎ-ÀÐÕÈÒÅÊÒÓÐÍÛÅ ÊÎÍÖÅÏÖÈÈ GEORGIY N. CHERKASOV, WAR MONUMENTS — 1941-1945 — AT INDUSTRIAL ENTERPRISES AND ON THE WARFIELDS, IDEOLOGY, TRUTH, IMAGERY, SUBSEQUENT SOCIAL-ARCHITECTURAL CONCEPTS
ØÓËÈÊÀ Ò.Î. ÎÒ ÀËÃÎÐÈÒÌÀ Ê ÑÈÑÒÅÌÅ: ÊÀÊ ÈÍÒÅÐÂÜÞ Ñ ÏÐÀÊÒÈÊÀÌÈ ÂÛßÂÈËÎ ÏÐÎÁËÅÌÍÛÅ ÓÇËÛ ÀÐÕÈÒÅÊÒÓÐÍÎÃÎ ÎÁÐÀÇÎÂÀÍÈß TATIANA O. SHULIKA, FROM ALGORITHM TO SYSTEM: HOW INTERVIEWS WITH PRACTITIONERS REVEALED THE PROBLEMATIC NODES OF ARCHITECTURAL EDUCATION
ÒÅÇÓÀÐÓÑ // THESAURUS
ÈÍÔÎÐÌÀÖÈÎÍÍÎÅ ÌÎÄÅËÈÐÎÂÀÍÈÅ ÇÄÀÍÈÉ (BIM) (Àááàñçàäåõ Í., Êàëóãèí À. Í., ×èñòÿêîâ Ä. À., Òóðêèíà Å. À.) ÑÎÂÐÅÌÅÍÍÛÅ ÀÝÐÎÂÎÊÇÀËÛ (Àâåðêèåâ Â. À.)
ÀÃÐÎÏÐÎÌÛØËÅÍÍÀß ÀÐÕÈÒÅÊÒÓÐÀ (Êîìàðîâà Ä. À., Êîíåâà Å. Â.)
ÀÂÒÎÐÛ ÍÎÌÅÐÀ
|